(Photo by Flickr user Ben Sutherland, used under a Creative Commons license)
There’s a reason why President Barack Obama received 100 percent of votes in 59 Philadelphia precincts in 2012.
Despite what presidential candidate Donald Trump might say, it has a lot less to do with rigging voting machines and a whole lot more to do with segregation and disenfranchisement.
“Large-scale voter fraud” will happen in cities like Philadelphia and Chicago, Trump warned earlier this month. As statistically improbable as it might seem for Democrats to sweep 100 percent of the vote in 59 voting districts, Chestnut Hill College professor and Social Enterprise Alliance Philadelphia advocate Jeffrey Carroll told the New York Times that it’s “definitely more about math than fraud.”
Gerrymandering has segregated and concentrated the Black vote. Trump’s accusations that Black voters are responsible for rigging voting patterns is adding insult to injury. Temple University political science professor Nyron Crawford warned of the dangers of undermining voting institutions.
“You have to pair that with the history of disenfranchisement among minority voters,” Crawford told NYT.-30-
From our Partners
White allies: I have a question for you
It takes a city: Dispatch from a two-month-old social enterprise
Check out Generocity’s 2020 editorial calendar
During Tech in Action Day, all the participants teach and learn
Public Health Management Corporation
TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN COMMUNITY UMBRELLA AGENCY CASE MANAGERApply Now
What I’ve learned about creating truly inclusive workplaces and how you can do it too
The young philanthropists of CCFWG’s Girls Advisory Board gear up for a new funding cycle
A resource for those transitioning professionally and personally, Career Wardrobe opens a second Delco site
ECS has been tackling Philly’s social issues for nearly 150 years. Now, its new focus is intergenerational poverty
Sign-up for daily news updates from Generocity