(Photo by Flickr user Ben Sutherland, used under a Creative Commons license)
There’s a reason why President Barack Obama received 100 percent of votes in 59 Philadelphia precincts in 2012.
Despite what presidential candidate Donald Trump might say, it has a lot less to do with rigging voting machines and a whole lot more to do with segregation and disenfranchisement.
“Large-scale voter fraud” will happen in cities like Philadelphia and Chicago, Trump warned earlier this month. As statistically improbable as it might seem for Democrats to sweep 100 percent of the vote in 59 voting districts, Chestnut Hill College professor and Social Enterprise Alliance Philadelphia advocate Jeffrey Carroll told the New York Times that it’s “definitely more about math than fraud.”
Gerrymandering has segregated and concentrated the Black vote. Trump’s accusations that Black voters are responsible for rigging voting patterns is adding insult to injury. Temple University political science professor Nyron Crawford warned of the dangers of undermining voting institutions.
“You have to pair that with the history of disenfranchisement among minority voters,” Crawford told NYT.-30-
From our Partners
Election 2020 isn’t over yet. Here’s a timeline to get you through the remaining electoral cycle
Opinion: This is how coup d’états begin
Celebrities thank Philly for Biden win
Beyond Literacy: Combining nearly 90 years of history into one org
Philly nonprofit legal orgs react to Trump campaign lawsuits
In Northeast Philadelphia, changing demographics and diverse issues bring first-time voters to the polls
It ain’t over til it’s over
Inscripción Doble en Congreso: Lo que trae el futuro
Sign-up for daily news updates from Generocity