(Photo by R. Kennedy for Visit Philadelphia)
Lately, I have been concerned with the direction of our regional United Way’s leadership.
The United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey does not have a single person of color on its executive leadership team. Not one. People of color represent less than a quarter of UWGPSNJ’s massive regional board of directors. With its mission to end generational poverty, you’d think the United Way would do better and I know it can.
- While 36.1 percent of Philadelphia’s youth live in poverty, Black children make up 20.4 percent of that number with Hispanic children coming in second at 9.4 percent.
- Approximately 2,900 children in Philadelphia are homeless, 78 percent of them Black.
- More than 66 percent of Black children live in a single female-headed household while more than 58 percent of Hispanic children live in a single female-headed household.
- Research shows that a child living in a single female-headed family is nearly five times more likely to be poor than a child living in a married family.
- Seventy two percent of the 10- to 18-year-olds in the juvenile justice system are Black.
These are all issues that the United Way seeks to address when its asks us to donate generously.
Three years ago, Derwin Dubose wrote a piece for the Nonprofit Quarterly regarding the nonprofit sector’s general lack of representation and how “the glaring disparity in nonprofit leadership bears a striking similarity to Ferguson,” where Michael Brown was killed. In Ferguson, two-thirds of the city’s population were Black, while “whites served as mayor, five of six city councilors, six of seven school board members, and 50 of 52 police officers.”
If UWGPSNJ’s mission is to eradicate generational poverty, and its biggest beneficiary is a largely Black and Latino population, why is it that there are so few people of color represented in United Way’s leadership? This is what Dubose calls the “Ferguson Problem.” I just never expected one of Philadelphia’s biggest philanthropic leaders to suffer from it.
From our Partners
I’m also surprised as the UWGPSNJ states in its own core values that it “promotes a culture of inclusion and seeks talented staff from all backgrounds.” Yet recently, we watched UWGPSJ part ways with its only person of color in an executive leadership position, leaving the executive team 100 percent white. Despite its rhetoric about inclusion, UWGPSNJ is currently moving backward.
People of color have been effectively relegated to being recipients of charity instead of being empowered to improve their own circumstances. The corporate and private donor class should not find this acceptable.
But all hope isn’t lost. There are two very important ways to get our local United Way to turn it around. First, funders have to lead the way. Donors must demand nonprofit diversity even of the United Way. Secondly, UWGPSNJ must aggressively go beyond the rhetoric of inclusion and aggressively recruit people of color as candidates for its executive staff and membership to its board.
UWGPSNJ is currently looking for a new CEO. Maybe it can start there.-30-
From our Partners
Bringing ‘behavioral vaccines’ to school: 5 ways educators can support student well-being
When little things mean a lot
View from the economic top
Inscripción Doble en Congreso: Lo que trae el futuro
What does education have to do with action — in the face of the climate crisis?
In a changing city, Germantown still has men who care
US museums hold the remains of thousands of Black people. What can be done about it?
Dual Enrollment at Congreso: Where does it go from here?
Sign-up for daily news updates from Generocity